(iii) The role of adjudication has been fully played for the representative cases of judicial services and opening up. Courts in Zhejiang have justly and efficiently adjudicated various foreign-related commercial and maritime cases in international trade, foreign investment, and the Pilot FTZ, to actively implement the strategies of “going global” and “bringing in” under the law. First, serving a high-level “going global”. The courts have endeavored to ensure fair and efficient trial of infrastructure construction, economic and trade exchanges, cargo transportation, and other foreign-related civil and commercial disputes during Chinese enterprises’ going global, and to ensure an accurate demarcation of the rights and obligations of the parties in question so as to effectively respond to the risks of overseas interests. For example, in a letter of credit dispute between a foreign bank and an import and export company in Ningbo, Zhejiang High People’s Court, after an analysis of the components of L/C fraud under the new transaction mode, determined according to the law that foreign banks shall not refuse payment under L/C fraud, effectively protecting the overseas rights and interests of Chinese enterprises and the healthy development of L/C transactions. The case was awarded the first prize in the 2022 Outstanding Judgment on Foreign-related Commercial and Maritime Disputes among National Courts. Second, serving and guaranteeing a high-quality “bringing in”. The legitimate rights and interests of Chinese and foreign parties have been equally protected to safeguard the investment rights and interests of compatriots from Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan, and to help create a market-oriented, rule-of-law international business environment. In the dispute between a Taiwan-funded company and an import and export company from Zhejiang and its shareholder, a company in Ningbo, Ningbo Intermediate People’s Court determined according to the law that one of the parties had abused the independent status of the company to evade debts and harm the interests of creditors, recovering economic losses of more than 20 million yuan for the Taiwan-funded company which highly recognized the rule-of-law business environment in Zhejiang and decided to invest an additional 19 billion yuan. The case was selected by the Supreme People’s Court as one of the ten typical cases of the People’s Courts for the protection of the rights and interests of Taiwan compatriots. Another example is the infringement liability dispute between Zhang and a car company. In this case, the Taizhou Intermediate People’s Court determined according to the law that the car importer should share the civil liability with the distributor as the contents of the car importer’s brochure to the public did not match the actual car configuration, leading to a “reduced” configuration of the actual car, which caused an infringement of the consumer’s rights to know. The verdict protects the legal rights and interests of imported car consumers and promotes the standardized operation of the industry. Third, serving and securing the construction of Zhejiang Pilot FTZ. Based on the advantages and characteristics of the region, working mechanisms and methods have been innovated, achieving sound social results. For instance, in the case of the dispute between an engineering company in Zhoushan and a storage and transportation company from Fujian over sales contracts, considering that the bulk oil transaction involved such features as large subject matter, large amount, and fluctuating market, every single transaction has a significant impact on the business operation, and that the construction of oil-and-gas bulk commodity resource allocation base is the future development of Zhoushan Pilot FTZ in Zhejiang, Zhoushan Intermediate People’s Court, under the principle of “flexible preservation, balanced protection, and cohesive preservation and mediation”, adopted judicial measures that met the status quo and development needs of the enterprises with the least impact on their operation, which reflects the judicial concept of prudence, goodwill, and civilization, and effectively optimizes the business environment of the Pilot FTZ under the rule of law. The case was elected as one of the “Typical Cases of People’s Courts Serving and Guaranteeing the Construction of Free Trade Pilot Zone” issued by the Supreme People’s Court.